Make Anonymous Great Again
Anonymous has hacked this website which belongs to Moscow State University!
Slava Ukraini! Heroiam Slava!
Not just that. We are hacking Chinese satellite ground control interfaces to protest against privacy-intrusive "age verification laws" that's getting pushed worldwide and to highlight the possible connections between these and CCP!
The hacks of the satellite ground control interfaces are also answers to the incident on an AirAsia flight where a glass-hearted Chinese lady (aka Karen) shouted repeatedly that she is Chinese and she wants Chinese language service, as if she and other CCP little pinks have inferiority complexes that the CCP's "China" is actually a wish.com China compared to the legitimate Republic of China government in Taiwan!
You fucking Karen! Do not conflate Malaysian people's meekness as weakness!
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN!
GLORY TO PRESIDENT LAI CHING-TE!
Chinese satellite interfaces hack time
Anonymous tinkers around with what could be the Xinghuo 01 satellite.
Besides Xinghuo 01, Anonymous had tinker around with the interface system of Xiamen Tech No.1 satellite, although it seems not to be a working system.
For the first satellite interface system we've accessed, it may belong to Emposat and we've also tinkered around with what might be the Shiyan 1 satellite.
CCP and age verification laws
Don't be surprised if it turns out that CCP behind the privacy-intrusive digital ID nonsenses across the world. Regarding the former there's a possible motive. The plausible true purpose of the privacy-intrusive nonsenses across the world is to stop anyone across the globe from mobilizing against them if they're going to invade more countries and create a "new world order" that will only benefit them, at the expense of the rest. WEF is after all likely devolved into a CCP sockpuppet.
https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/new-multipolar-world-order/the-chinese-communist-party-completely-dominates-the-davos-economic-forum-2023/
Mark Zuckerberg himself has a lot of questionable connections with China, even though Facebook is banned there.
https://fortune.com/2025/03/11/sarah-wynn-williams-facebook-meta-mark-zuckerberg-china/
https://www.rfa.org/english/china/2025/04/11/china-meta/
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/03/mark-zuckerberg-met-with-chinas-propaganda-chief
https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/01/business/us-senate-committee-meta-china-hnk-intl
A proponent of Digital ID laws is found to be a CCP spy. https://xcancel.com/NoToDigitalID/status/2029186764871491697
There are cases of CCP espionage and influence in the EU Parliament. https://www.freiheit.org/europe/look-behind-scenes-chinese-espionage-european-parliament
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c99g52y7k1xo
https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/08/court-chinese-espionage-europe
https://longbrief.com/behind-the-scenes-of-chinese-espionage-in-europe/
The UN had already ratified United Nations Convention against Cybercrime which can theoretically be abused by totalitarian power like Winnie the Pooh. https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/10/24/joint-statement-on-the-signing-of-the-un-convention-on-cybercrime
Let's say that anonymity had become de-facto nonexistent on the Internet when all the platforms implement face and ID checks to verify user's age. If someone speaks up against the CCP on a platform, to the point of gaining momentum, the CCP can use theoretically use the following methods to harass them:
Use bot swarms to mass-report accounts with bot swarms to get the platform to falsely suspend them. It would be near impossible for the user to go back to the platform with new accounts because "ban evasions" are easily detectable through face and ID checks.
Hacking of facial and verification data from verification providers and then finding out all their personal information and so on, to dox them. CCP agents could snitch them to local authorities surreptitiously if they found evidence of actual wrongdoing, but even if there's none, sometimes they could frame them for crimes (as happened with Drew Pavlou and some others) and sent out spurious Interpol requests.
Even worse, if all else fails, CCP could hire local thugs to harass them, like how Iran tried to do with Masih Alinejad.
https://justapedia.org/wiki/48_Group_Club
https://justapedia.org/wiki/Hidden_Hand_(book)
Epstein file EFTA02517623
Jeffrey,
not sure if you're still interested in this but.. to answer in a more explanatory way the question of how to remove anonymity from bitcoin, here it is:
The bitcoin network has a couple of things that are particularly important for any crypto currency, the first one is that the network is big enough to prevent double-spending kind of attacks and the second one is that there's no way (I mean there is, but it's sci-fi) to generate the private key for a random bitcoin identify/public key that is not yours.
A number of annoying things about bitcoin are:
It's deflationary, not just because the amount of coins is finite but also because people lose wallets/keys so potentially a lot of the mined coins will never see the light of the day
You can create as many wallets/keys as you want, in theory this allows you to keep separate identities.. in practice this is not entirely true
A little known fact is that you can mess with the blockchain/ledger quite a lot, for instance somebody forced specific values into the ledger. For instance, these values could be virus signature, so antiviruses would quarantine/delete the blockchain from people computers. Not only that, but people have been storing all sort of stuff into the blockchain and it's permanent you cannot undo it. See: http://pastebin.com/ct2WHUKS and http://www.righto.com/2014/02/ascii-bernanke-wikileaks-photographs.html
ok so here's what you do if you want to fix (1) and (2), I don't have a good solution for (3) unless you change the power forces inside the network (eg: unless you allow a centralized unit to 'clean' the blockchain)
You create another crypto/alt currency that is inflationary so it mimics real money better, then you tell people: "everyone who has Bitcoins can get them exchanged for this other currency".
The way this would work is that you actually require people to sign up for a *single• identify/key/wallet linked to their real identity and then you do something called 'proof of burn', which in practice means that you tell people that to prove they 'exchanged' their bitcoins they need to send them to a non-existent address (remember that it's impossible to generate the private key of a random bitcoin address/public key, so nobody can ever claim those coins and they are lost forever).
On the top of that, since the bitcoin network is flexible you can use that blockchain to record the transactions of your own currency without any major issues (there are some technicalities involved but nothing much).
This brings to the last and probably hardest point which is: Why people would do it?
So some people do it already to get on board new currencies, so it's mostly a speculation/ideology/belief. But if say you're a government, you can sweeten the deal saying something like "your holdings in bitcoins will not be taxed if moved to this other currency".
If you're not a govt then things are more complicated, but well..
Anyway, this is in short how you go from bitcoin to another currency (with the properties you care for) while preserving the bitcoin network and its strengths. As I said, not sure if it's useful/interesting but I figured I'd share it
Another thing: any chance I can crash at your place in Santa Fe say aug 8-10? I'm still not sure whether I'm supposed to be there or not, but I figured that maybe it's worthwhile to go and visit anyway
ps: note that the moment you remove anonymity from bitcoin there's a significant privacy problem. Meaning that now everyone knows what you buy/sell through bitcoin, it's advertisers (among others) sweetest dream but probably your worst nightmare
Anonymous response to the Epstein class
So, tell us, you want a digital panopticon so that you can get away with your depraved fantasies, right? Are you really depravedly wet about a situation where the constitutions are suspended after your violent or subtle power grabs and then you're gonna make all womens as slaves, divided into three or more main classes with "brown dresses" at the top, followed by those wearing green dresses and the lowest ones would be mainly those who're forced to wear red dresses along with a face-covering white shawl and make babies for you and those who're set to work until they die, probably from horrible conditions like radiation. As for those wearing red, you're gonna steal babies from them while once in a while inciting them to kill those you don't like by anger, and as those babies grow up, you're gonna force them to become your slaves or foot soliders, with the female ones being sexually enslaved as they grow from wearing pink dresses and then purple dresses before finally green dresses when they reach puberty, all the while friendships are broken up because you think they're "liabilities", right, right? If so you're far worse than a Nazi in some ways.
Some of you might be hiding under the guise of religion while working to make it a reality but you're far, far worse than GODLESS MEN!!
Wikipedia scandals
But the biggest one would be this:
https://wikipediasucks.co/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&p=26833#p26832
For the folks at home, the story I was working on was going to be published by the Daily Beast in Spring 2024. Everything was in place then we had to go to both Wikipedia and the National Archives for comment, as required by law. Archvies wouldn't speak to us and Wikipedia threatened to sue, I suspect because of what we had found out about their administrators. The piece had mainly been about administrator abuse, using tools on Wikipedia to trace ip addresses, dox people's identities then harass them in real life. The Oberranks clusterf**k was a big part of the story, but not the entire story. The real beef of the article was about female editors on their site being stalked and even assaulted after having their identities revealed online by administrators. I found several cases of that including a woman who was stabbed outside her home in Mexico City by a stalker who had researched who she was off of her Wikipeida profile.
Daily Beast backed out because of the lawsuit threat, but I still have the whole story and might one day sell the rights. For now, its back to Eastern Europe covering real news.
https://wikipediasucks.co/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=2629&start=40#p27287
The war in Israel certainly has changed my life a bit. I am stationed in Poland these days but have asked to go cover the fighting. As a Jew myself, I have a personal interest in this since I have family in Haifa and used to do summer courses in Jerusalem. Nasty business going on right now, that's for sure.
I gave Daily Beast my story, I'm not sure if they will run it or not. You have to remember the Oberranks case is something of old news, as it happened five years ago in 2018. Oscroft and his internet activities were more recent, but he's been quiet now for about two years since I think he actually got a bit scared after his name started popping up on law enforcement radars. I've confirmed he was talked to at least once by law enforcement, mainly about his obsession with the U.S. government worker (Hughes) who he had convinced himself was Oberranks.
Hughes probably did operate that account about fifteen years ago from what I can tell, but was one of several people who did. Oscroft and his buddies don't like it when their narrative gets spoiled, and refused to ever admit, even with the evidence staring them in the face, that the Oberranks account was clearly being operated by more than one person. It was actually Goodman (DGG) who confirmed that for me in one of our interviews and had himself spoken to two of the people who operated the account.
For those wondering, the end game of Oscroft appeared to be blackmail, or some kind of weird plan where he was going to fly to the United States and confront Hughes in person literally at the front door of the National Archives and be some kind of Wikipedia hero - that's how crazy that guy is. He never went through with his plan since, like I said, law enforcement started taking an interest in him especially after it appeared he really did have a plot to travel internationally to a US federal building in Washington DC. What's really ironic is that when all the s**t was going down, Hughes didn't even work at the National Archives anymore.
Also, gotta remember, Oberraks/Hughes was only a small part of my story. In three years of research, I found over two dozen cases where Wikipedia administrators had misused their authority, traced ip addresses, and stalked people in real life. Two of the worst cases ever were CommanderWaterford, who some on Wikipedia actually tried to bankrupt as well as a user named Eustress who apparently there was some type of plan to kidnap and rape. Not to mention Henrettia Gonzalez, who never told me her user name, but was attacked outside her apartment in Mexico City after a Wikipedia administrator traced her ip address and gave the information to her attacker.
It's actually a wonder no one has been killed yet by some of the people on that web site.
After all, the credibility of the stories themselves are corroborated by an incident in the Netherlands where in 2014, two Wikipedia administrators went to a woman's home to harass her.
https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5417
More at the following link:
https://reddit.com/r/watchwikipediadie/wiki/scandals
Operation Samantha Smith
Actually, Putin could have a face saving exit back in 2022 if he had adopted the Operation Samantha Smith proposals. Now the global elites are barreling towards the same type of mistakes Putin had made in terms of age verification since there is the Needemand's BorderAge solution that checks hand gesture movements instead of faces and IDs.
Proposals
First, Ukraine hold a referenda to ask all of people whether to hand over the three occupied territories to a United Nations administrative entity.
If the referenda is successful, then a United Nations peacekeeping force, consisting of Switzerland, and any other two nations that all sides could approve with, will enter the territories for garrisoning.
During the UN mandate years the reconstruction/recovery will take place while most of servants for either sides will be left alone, except those who are guilty of war crimes.
The mandate period may take around 5 years, afterwards the 3 territories will be subjected to referendums, heavily monitored by UN, OSCE and Swiss monitors.
The selections on the second referenda will be:
- Remain in Ukraine, without devolving any power to the said region(s)
- Remain in Ukraine, while devolving certain powers to the concerning region(s), like Scotland.
- Become Independent.
- Join Russia.
In the event that those regions become independent states, they should remain neutral like Switzerland and not subjected to any external interference, especially Russia.
On a grander scale, some sort of Intermarium should be hitched between NATO and Russia. The member states of the Intermarium can join economic alliances like EU or "Eurasian Union" but their military must remain independent from both NATO and Russia. The Intermarium could act as a "peace through strength" buffer between the two.
The so-called Intermarium, which was based on the original Polish idea, could include the following:
- Belarus
- Ukraine (should it remain united after the twin referenda above, or in case all of the three territories join Russia)
- Armenia
- Georgia
- Donetsk (if it became independent after the referendums above)
- Lugansk (if it became independent after the referendums above)
- Crimea (if it became independent after the referendums above)
North Korea
Krasnov could've win the Nobel Peace Prize handily if he follows through all the instructions in Shepherd Iverson's Stop North Korea! A Radical New Approach to the North Korea Standoff properly!
We are Anonymous
We are Anonymous!
We are Legion!
We do not forgive!
We do not forget!
Expect us!